Tinderbox vs. PersonalBrain. Grudge match or play nice?

Tinderbox and PersonalBrain. Two relatively costly applications that do similar things. Why on earth would anyone need both?

Forget for a moment that I’m basically crazy and have an illness we call Compulsive Reactive Information Manager Purchasing (or CRIMP for short) at outlinersoftware web site. These two applications are actually more complementary than they might first appear. Really.

Tinderbox is a much more complex tool — at least from my point of view as a user. In fact, it is too complex for me to make it my go-to, hold-everything application. I find it too difficult to extract data, and even putting information in can be cumbersome in certain instances.*

*In a seeming concession to this point, Eastgate has released the beta version of a new “little brother” application to Tinderbox called Twig. It appears to be a simpler, easier to use version of Tinderbox, although I haven’t played around with it enough to determine if it succeeds in this aspiration.

PersonalBrain, on the other hand, is pretty easy to use. Most functions feel streamlined, especially creating relationships among my notes. It feels much more integrated with the web and other applications.

For example, you can open and launch a new file in any of a number of other pieces of software from within PersonalBrain. That file can be stored within PB or elsewhere on you computer.

In PersonalBrain it is easier to get an overview of your information by expanding the Plex view.

CommonPlace Book expanded in PersonalBrain

My CommonPlace Book database expanded.

Tinderbox excels at analysis. It’s a place for me to plan and think. The map view is especially powerful for this purpose. It also has a the ability to add key attributes (i.e. database fields), so it would be much more useful for structured information than PersonalBrain.

Neither Tinderbox nor PersonalBrain excels for composing information within their limited editors, although both are serviceable, with Tinderbox having a slight edge.

Tinderbox is the more complete application. That is, it can serve as an information manager, a structured database, a mindmapper, an outliner, a flow charter, a blog manager, a project manager, and probably many more that I haven’t thought of.

The Plex in PersonalBrain is, however, more pliable than any of the views in Tinderbox. That is, you can scale it to see whatever level of complexity you need. You can even view your data in a quasi outline. The Map View in Tinderbox restricts you to one level of detail at a time. To see more of you information you need to switch to Chart or Outline views. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it may not be as smooth a work flow.

Three views in Tinderbox

CommonPlace Book database in three windows in Tinderbox, showing Outline, Map and Chart views

It’s funny, as I write about both these applications, I find myself getting revved up over each of them for their own strengths.

So, to get back to the original question, why would anyone need both Tinderbox and PersonalBrain? No one does. Not really. You could make due very well with either of these applications, or, in fact, with any of the dozens of other options available.

But…

For me, at least, Tinderbox and PersonalBrain are compatible and serve entirely different functions. I’m happy to support both developers. If I had to choose just one, I would probably take PersonalBrain because it is cross platform. If the long-promised Windows version is ever released, however, Tinderbox would be the application I’d select because of its incredible versatility.

Fortunately, I don’t have to choose one or the other, and both applications can grace my MacBook.

About these ads
Categories: Software | Tags: , | 9 Comments

Post navigation

9 thoughts on “Tinderbox vs. PersonalBrain. Grudge match or play nice?

  1. Good post. Minor edit: “complimentary” s/b “complementary”

    You might also find thinklinkr.com to be of interest: a Web 2.0 outliner that’s quite powerful and can export and import files. Free. Obviously platform independent, since it runs on the Web.

    I like it, and I did send the developers my set of Grandview manuals to help them think of features.

    • Vermonter 17032

      Thanks for the correction!

      I’ve looked at thinklinkr in the past, but now can’t recall much about it. I’ll have to take a look again. Thanks!

      Steve

      • You’re welcome.

        Thinklinkr is now in full release (beta no more) and they really did add a lot. I’ll be very interested in your impressions of this current version.

    • MBB

      No, “complementary” was perfectly correct. Roughly speaking, it means adding to, or making perfect. See the Oxford English Dictionary.

      • MBB

        Ah, apologies — I didn’t twig that the correction had actually been made! (and that the original must have read “complimentary”). I’ll read things more carefully next time!

  2. Vermonter 17032

    LeisureGuy,

    I just took a look at the Thinklinkr video. I can see how this can be an excellent tool for web-based collaboration and for basic outlining. It appears to lack some of the more sophisticated outlining functions, such as hoisting and cloning. I was disappointed that the video only mentioned columns, but did not demonstrate them.

    Also, it concerns me that it is free. I don’t see how it can be sustainable.

    But more investigation may be necessary!

    Steve

  3. Steve,

    Thanks for checking out the video. There are a lot of sophisticated features that we are planning on adding – including hoist and cloning. We decided to start by focusing our efforts on creating a fast and responsive web UI and integrating real-time collaboration features that set us apart from other outliners.

    The columns section of the video was a bit premature. When we made the video we intended on introducing columns as the next feature. Columns keep getting delayed but they are coming soon.

    You’re right to be concerned about sustainability of a free app. We were completely free during beta, but with our last release we introduced pro accounts which cost $5/month.

    Let me know if you have any questions,

    Jason

  4. Pingback: Tinderbox redux « Welcome to Sherwood

  5. Pingback: PersonalBrain as a management tool « Welcome to Sherwood

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com. The Adventure Journal Theme.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 233 other followers

%d bloggers like this: